SemanticMetadata.net

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

1. [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...]

   Pingback by H.264 compression test published — March 10, 2008 #

2. [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...]

   Pingback by » H.264 compression test published — March 10, 2008 #

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Spam protection: Sum of 6 + 7 ?

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>