Comments on: H.264 compression test published http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2008/03/10/h264-compression-test-published/ Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:29:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: » H.264 compression test published http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2008/03/10/h264-compression-test-published/comment-page-1/#comment-118994 » H.264 compression test published Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:19:08 +0000 http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2008/03/10/h264-compression-test-published/#comment-118994 [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...] [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...]

]]> By: H.264 compression test published http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2008/03/10/h264-compression-test-published/comment-page-1/#comment-118993 H.264 compression test published Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:12:46 +0000 http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2008/03/10/h264-compression-test-published/#comment-118993 [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...] [...] Product Reviews Net wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt Today I found a compression test on different H.264 (and one MPEG-4 ASP) encoders. They tested the compression to visual quality ratio and found out that the MainConcept encoder (German company, recently acquired by DivX) performs best. The difference to the next rank however is marginal and x264 is second. Deciding based on a compression to price ratio will therefore be very easy Related Links: Compression test MainConcept x264  (on Wikipedia) [...]

]]>