<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SemanticMetadata.net &#187; IDE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semanticmetadata.net/category/ide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semanticmetadata.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:35:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NetBeans Community Approves NetBeans 6.7 for Prime Time Release</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2009/06/24/netbeans-community-approves-netbeans-67-for-prime-time-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2009/06/24/netbeans-community-approves-netbeans-67-for-prime-time-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Lux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbeans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticmetadata.net/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NetBeans community acceptance survey has voted for thhe last NetBeans 6.7 RC to be stable enough to be shipped. While this sounds great there is one minor details I consider critical for the significance of the survey: Only 182 people responded. (re-engineneered from 144 people being 79%). If we go with common numbers in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NetBeans community acceptance survey has voted for thhe last NetBeans 6.7 RC to be stable enough to be shipped. While this sounds great there is one minor details I consider critical for the significance of the survey: Only 182 people responded. (re-engineneered from 144 people being 79%). If we go with common numbers in empirical research ~5 % of the population take part in survey like these and therefore I conclude that the size of the NetBeans community is around 3.600 people.</p>
<p>NetBeans is actually having quite a a hard time with Eclipse pressing from open source and Idea pressing from commercial alternatives. Also the free IDEs of Microsoft&#8217;s .NET family affect the scene. However, I still think that if NetBeans manages to advance from the &#8220;I can do all&#8221; principle to a small and lean application development environment featuring a fast and intelligent editor and a WYSIWYG gui builder there is definitely a chance.</p>
<p><strong>Links</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.netbeans.org/servlets/NewsItemView?newsItemID=1398">Announcement</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2009/06/24/netbeans-community-approves-netbeans-67-for-prime-time-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Test of NetBeans 6.0 RC 2 (Windows XP, just the Java SE version)</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/11/29/small-test-of-netbeans-60-rc-2-windows-xp-just-the-java-se-version/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/11/29/small-test-of-netbeans-60-rc-2-windows-xp-just-the-java-se-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Lux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbeans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming java ide netbeans test review bug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/11/29/small-test-of-netbeans-60-rc-2-windows-xp-just-the-java-se-version/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Installation works fine and fast, start up speed is ok. The start up screen gives enough hints to start with. I like that as it is especially good for people starting with Java and/or NetBeans. I&#8217;m really satisfied now with the editor. It works fast enough and the completion hints are fine. Classes and members [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.semanticmetadata.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/nbrc2-ss2.png" title="nbrc2-ss2.png"><img src="http://www.semanticmetadata.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/nbrc2-ss2.thumbnail.png" alt="nbrc2-ss2.png" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /></a><span lang="EN-GB">Installation works fine and fast, start up speed is ok. The start up screen gives enough hints to start with. I like that as it is especially good for people starting with Java and/or NetBeans. I&#8217;m really satisfied now with the editor. It works fast enough and the completion hints are fine. Classes and members the editor does not know are created fast enough by hitting <em>&lt;alt&gt;-&lt;enter&gt;</em>. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I found one <strike>bug</strike> thing though: I created a class Tile with two members: One of the class <em>Rectangle2D.Double</em> and one of the class <em>Point2D.Double</em>. When using the automatic Getter and Setter code generation the return values for the Getter for the point were just <em>Double</em> while the Getter for the rectangle returned <em>java.awt.geom.Rectangle2D.Double</em>. That&#8217;s not really an issue, I know, but not the optimal way of programming either. At least I was not satisfied and edited the source afterwards <img src='http://www.semanticmetadata.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/11/29/small-test-of-netbeans-60-rc-2-windows-xp-just-the-java-se-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: NetBeans 6 M7 available!</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/25/update-netbeans-6-m7-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/25/update-netbeans-6-m7-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Lux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/25/update-netbeans-6-m7-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An update to my previous entry: NetBeans 6 Milestone 7 was released: That&#8217;s the time for trying out 8-). A first beta is expected in May, the final release in November 2007. See also the NetBeans Roadmap for more insight. What&#8217;s inside M7? Java Webstart development simplified (Creation of jnlp file &#38; running locally for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update to my previous entry: <a href="http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/NewAndNoteWorthyMilestone7">NetBeans 6 Milestone 7</a> was released: That&#8217;s the time for trying out 8-). A first beta is expected in May, the final release in November 2007. See also the <a href="http://www.netbeans.org/community/releases/roadmap.html">NetBeans Roadmap</a> for more insight.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s inside M7?</p>
<ul>
<li>Java Webstart development simplified (Creation of jnlp file &amp; running locally for testing)</li>
<li>Redesigned Icons (Uh! Good looks <img src='http://www.semanticmetadata.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</li>
<li>Local history function</li>
<li>EJB Code Generation, JBoss 5 support and much more</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/25/update-netbeans-6-m7-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netbeans 6.0 &#8211; A Reasonable IDE Option?</title>
		<link>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/22/netbeans-60-a-reasonable-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/22/netbeans-60-a-reasonable-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Lux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbeans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/22/netbeans-60-a-reasonable-option/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having heard a great deal about Netbeans 6.0 and I installed it some days ago (some daily build: 200702162122). My main intention was to find out if it was time to switch to Netbeans &#8230; and in my humble opinion NB 6 will be a reasonable alternative to Eclipse and Idea with 6.0! So here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having heard a great deal about Netbeans 6.0 and I installed it some days ago (some daily build: 200702162122). My main intention was to find out if it was time to switch to Netbeans &#8230; and in my humble opinion NB 6 will be a reasonable alternative to Eclipse and Idea with 6.0!</p>
<p>So here are my findings:</p>
<ul>
<li>The new editor is great (compared to the old one)! It&#8217;s fast enough, has meaningful shortcuts (roughly the same as IntelliJ Idea) and it works rather smooth and does what one likes it to do.</li>
<li>The GUI editor is great and the only (free) GUI editor that simply works. Furthermore the built-in i18n things are really really cool! (totally missing in Idea).</li>
<li>Most of the refactoring is missing, but I hope it will find its way in until the final version.</li>
<li>The same goes for the code completion: It is there in different flavors, but it does not do what one might expect. <img src='http://www.semanticmetadata.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>Using <em>&lt;alt&gt;-&lt;enter&gt;</em> in the editor while text is selected brings up a new template dialog, which is a combination between &#8220;Surround code with ..&#8221; and Live Templates.</li>
</ul>
<p>The daily build proved rather stable and I continue to use it. However there is one thing that nearly drove me mad: I created a panel and set it to CardLayout. Then I put in three panels in the CardLayout panel. After that I wasn&#8217;t able to move the CardLayout panel any more (dragging it around in the GUI editor)! At last I found a workaround: Giving the CardLayout panel an empty border one can then drag the panel around using the border pixels 8-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticmetadata.net/2007/02/22/netbeans-60-a-reasonable-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

